The Skaapsteker's presence in published literature stretches back to the earliest natural history writings produced in southern Africa. Cape Colony naturalists and traveling correspondents of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries regularly mentioned the snake in their dispatches and published accounts, though these early references were typically brief and heavily colored by the prevailing folk belief that the species posed a threat to livestock. The Skaapsteker appeared not as a subject of independent literary interest but as a background element in broader narratives about the challenges and curiosities of pastoral life at the southern tip of Africa.
Afrikaans-language literature of the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries gave the Skaapsteker a more prominent if still largely incidental role. The plaasroman, or farm novel, a genre that became central to Afrikaans literary identity during the early and mid-twentieth century, frequently depicted the natural world of the South African veld in rich detail, and snakes including the Skaapsteker appeared as part of the fabric of rural existence that these novels sought to capture. In this literary context, the Skaapsteker typically functioned as a marker of landscape authenticity, its presence signaling the open grasslands and Karoo scrublands that formed the settings for many of these works.
English-language nature writing about southern Africa has engaged with the Skaapsteker more directly in recent decades, as authors working in the tradition of literary natural history have sought to illuminate the lesser-known elements of the region's biodiversity. Field guide authors and popular science writers have used the Skaapsteker as an illustrative case study in how common names can shape public perception of wildlife, drawing attention to the gap between the snake's fearsome-sounding Afrikaans name and its ecologically benign reality.
The Skaapsteker has also appeared in academic and popular herpetological literature, where its taxonomic history, venom characteristics, and ecological role have been the subjects of peer-reviewed papers and accessible review articles. While these publications reach a specialized audience, the cumulative body of Skaapsteker-related scientific literature has been instrumental in establishing an accurate factual baseline against which popular misconceptions can be measured and corrected.