Pullorum Disease (poultry) in Farm Animals

Quick Facts

🏥 Condition Name
Pullorum Disease (poultry)
📋 Also Known As
Pullorum, Bacillary White Diarrhea, BWD, Salmonella Pullorum Infection
📂 Category
Infectious Diseases - Bacterial
📁 Subcategory
N/A
🐄 Affects
Primarily chicks; reproductive tract and systemic infection in adults
🏷️ Type
Infectious
⚠️ Severity
Severe in chicks, often subclinical in adults
💊 Treatable
Antimicrobials not recommended due to carrier state; eradication focus
🔄 Contagious
Yes, through egg transmission and direct contact
🧬 Hereditary
No, but vertical transmission through eggs is critical
🐄 Common In
Chickens and turkeys; rare in commercial flocks due to eradication programs

Pullorum Disease (poultry) Overview

Pullorum disease is a serious bacterial infection of poultry caused by Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Pullorum, commonly referred to as Salmonella Pullorum. This disease primarily affects chickens and turkeys, causing acute systemic infection with high mortality in young chicks while adult birds typically become chronic carriers that transmit the organism through their eggs. The disease was historically one of the most devastating poultry diseases worldwide, causing enormous economic losses before the development and implementation of eradication programs. Today, pullorum disease has been effectively eliminated from commercial poultry operations in the United States and many other countries through rigorous testing and culling programs, though it remains a concern in backyard flocks and developing regions.

The disease primarily affects domestic chickens and turkeys, with chickens being the natural host and primary reservoir of the organism. Turkeys are also susceptible and can experience significant mortality, though they appear somewhat more resistant than chickens. Other gallinaceous birds including pheasants, guinea fowl, and quail can become infected. Wild birds occasionally test positive but do not appear to be significant reservoirs for commercial poultry infection. The disease has been effectively controlled in commercial poultry through the National Poultry Improvement Plan in the United States and similar programs in other countries, making it rare in properly monitored commercial operations but still present in non-monitored backyard and hobby flocks.

The economic and historical significance of pullorum disease cannot be overstated in the context of poultry industry development. Before implementation of control programs in the 1930s and subsequent decades, pullorum disease caused mortality rates of 80 percent or higher in infected chick batches, devastating hatcheries and broiler operations alike. The disease was the primary driver behind development of the National Poultry Improvement Plan in 1935, which established testing protocols and certification standards that transformed the industry. Success of the pullorum eradication program demonstrated that systematic testing and removal of carrier birds could eliminate vertically transmitted diseases, establishing principles later applied to other poultry diseases.

While pullorum disease is technically treatable with antimicrobials, treatment is strongly discouraged because it suppresses clinical signs without eliminating the carrier state, allowing infected birds to continue spreading the disease through their eggs. The focus of pullorum disease control is prevention through testing and eradication rather than treatment. Any positive flock identification triggers regulatory involvement and typically results in depopulation of affected birds. This approach has proven highly successful, with commercial poultry in participating countries being effectively free of the disease. However, vigilance must continue, as introduction from non-tested sources could re-establish the disease in susceptible populations.

Causes of Pullorum Disease (poultry)

Salmonella Pullorum is the exclusive causative agent of pullorum disease, a gram-negative bacterium that has co-evolved with chickens to become highly adapted to avian hosts. Unlike many Salmonella serovars that infect multiple species and cause primarily gastrointestinal disease, Salmonella Pullorum is host-adapted and causes systemic infection with a particular affinity for reproductive tissues. The organism is non-motile, distinguishing it from most other Salmonella, and produces characteristic colonies on culture media that aid laboratory identification. While closely related to Salmonella Gallinarum, which causes fowl typhoid, the two organisms cause distinct disease syndromes and are differentiated by biochemical testing.

Genetic factors in poultry may influence susceptibility to pullorum disease, though these are less well characterized than in some other poultry diseases. Some research suggests breed differences in susceptibility exist, with heavier breeds potentially more resistant than lighter breeds. Line and strain differences within breeds have also been suggested, indicating genetic variation in immune response to Salmonella Pullorum. However, because effective eradication programs have eliminated the disease from most commercial genetics programs, selection for resistance has not been a practical breeding objective. Any genetic susceptibility differences are overcome by the highly effective testing and removal programs that prevent exposure in the first place.

Vertical transmission through infected eggs represents the most important route of infection and the primary target of control programs. Infected hens harbor Salmonella Pullorum in their ovaries, and the organism is incorporated into developing eggs before shell formation, resulting in internally contaminated eggs that cannot be disinfected. Chicks hatching from infected eggs may die in the shell, die shortly after hatching, or survive to become carriers that perpetuate the cycle. Horizontal transmission also occurs, with infected chicks shedding large numbers of organisms in their droppings that contaminate hatcher environments and infect other chicks. Direct contact with infected birds, contaminated equipment, and personnel can spread the organism between flocks.

Risk factors for pullorum disease introduction include acquisition of birds from untested sources, exposure to wild or feral birds, contact with contaminated equipment or personnel, and proximity to infected premises. Backyard flocks that acquire birds from multiple sources without testing face elevated risk compared to commercial operations participating in testing programs. Exhibition poultry that commingle at shows present opportunities for transmission between flocks. Failure to maintain biosecurity allows potential introduction from environmental sources. Poor hatchery sanitation amplifies transmission when infected eggs are present, as the warm, moist environment is ideal for bacterial multiplication and aerosol spread.

Pathophysiology of pullorum disease differs between chicks and adults, reflecting the organism's adaptation to its host. In chicks infected in ovo or shortly after hatching, the organism rapidly invades from the intestinal tract to cause septicemia affecting multiple organs including liver, spleen, lungs, and heart. High bacterial loads in tissues cause organ dysfunction and death, often within the first two weeks of life. Surviving chicks may clear the infection or become chronic carriers. In adult birds, the immune system usually controls systemic spread, and infection localizes to the reproductive tract where the organism persists indefinitely, resulting in intermittent egg transmission without obvious clinical signs in the carrier bird.

Symptoms & Warning Signs

Early warning signs in chicks may be apparent even before hatch, with increased numbers of dead embryos or chicks dead in shell during the final days of incubation. Delayed hatch with chicks appearing weak and unable to break through shell membranes efficiently suggests problems that may include pullorum infection. Immediately post-hatch, affected chicks may appear weak, drowsy, and reluctant to move. Huddling near heat sources despite adequate ambient temperature indicates chilling that accompanies systemic infection. Decreased interest in feed and water becomes apparent within the first day or two as illness progresses. Peeping may become weaker or take on a distressed quality compared to healthy chicks.

Classic clinical presentation in young chicks includes the characteristic white diarrhea that gives the disease its alternative name, bacillary white diarrhea. This distinctive white, pasty material accumulates around the vent, causing pasting that may completely obstruct the cloaca. Affected chicks show marked depression and weakness, often remaining stationary with ruffled feathers, drooped wings, and closed eyes. Respiratory signs including gasping or labored breathing may develop as infection affects the lungs. Growth retardation becomes obvious in chicks that survive the initial acute phase, with affected birds noticeably smaller than healthy hatchmates. Mortality typically begins around two to three days of age, peaks at one to two weeks, and may continue for several weeks in affected groups.

Behavioral changes in affected chicks are marked and assist in identifying sick individuals for removal. Sick chicks separate from the group and remain near heat sources or in corners rather than actively exploring their environment. Feed consumption drops dramatically, and affected chicks may be found sitting in feeders rather than eating. Water consumption decreases, contributing to dehydration that worsens the clinical condition. Normal vocalization patterns change, with affected chicks either silent or producing weak distress calls. Mobility decreases progressively until severely affected chicks become recumbent and unable to stand.

Physical examination findings in acutely affected chicks reveal multiple abnormalities reflecting systemic infection. Body condition deteriorates rapidly, with loss of subcutaneous fat and muscle mass. The abdomen may appear distended due to retained yolk material that fails to absorb normally, or may appear tucked up in chicks with severe diarrhea and dehydration. Mucous membranes may appear pale in severely affected chicks due to anemia. Vent pasting with characteristic white material is highly suggestive of pullorum disease. In some cases, swollen joints indicating localized infection may be palpable. Respiratory sounds including rales or increased respiratory effort may be detected on careful examination.

Symptom progression in untreated flocks follows a predictable pattern of increasing mortality followed by gradual decline as the most susceptible birds die and survivors develop immunity. Initial mortality appears around three to five days of age, increases rapidly to peak around one to two weeks, and then gradually decreases over the following weeks. Surviving birds may appear to recover completely but many become chronic carriers. In adult birds, symptoms are typically absent or minimal, with occasional decreased egg production, reduced hatchability of eggs, or vague signs of illness the only indicators of infection. Some adult carriers may develop pericarditis, peritonitis, or other localized infections.

Emergency situations in pullorum disease relate primarily to flock-level events rather than individual bird emergencies. Sudden onset of high mortality in young chicks, particularly with characteristic white diarrhea, requires immediate investigation and reporting to regulatory authorities. Mortality rates approaching or exceeding 50 percent in affected batches indicate severe outbreak requiring urgent intervention. Any positive pullorum test in a previously negative flock triggers immediate regulatory response. Detection of pullorum disease in breeding flocks is especially critical due to the potential for widespread dissemination through egg distribution. Prompt reporting enables rapid response to limit spread and protect other poultry operations.

Diagnosis

Clinical examination and history provide initial suspicion of pullorum disease, with characteristic presentation in young chicks from unmonitored sources being highly suggestive. The combination of high mortality in the first two weeks of life, white diarrhea with vent pasting, and hudding behavior in chicks creates a clinical picture that should prompt immediate consideration of pullorum disease. History of bird acquisition from untested sources, exposure at exhibitions, or connection to other affected premises strengthens suspicion. However, clinical signs alone cannot definitively diagnose pullorum disease, and laboratory confirmation is essential for regulatory purposes and proper response.

Serological testing forms the cornerstone of pullorum surveillance and detection programs. The whole blood plate agglutination test provides rapid, inexpensive screening that can be performed on-farm with minimal equipment. A drop of blood is mixed with stained Salmonella Pullorum antigen, and visible agglutination within two minutes indicates a positive reaction. Tube agglutination testing provides more quantitative results and is used for confirmatory testing of reactors. The pullorum typhoid antigen used in these tests cross-reacts with Salmonella Gallinarum, so positive results indicate infection with one or both organisms. Regular testing of breeding flocks, typically at least annually, forms the basis of certification programs and early detection.

Bacteriological culture provides definitive diagnosis by isolating and identifying the organism from infected birds. In dead chicks, samples from liver, spleen, yolk sac, and cecum yield the highest isolation rates. Culture media selective for Salmonella are inoculated and incubated, with suspicious colonies identified through biochemical testing and serotyping. In adult carriers, culture of ovarian tissue is most reliable, as the organism persists in reproductive tissues. Culture of cloacal swabs may detect some carriers but misses many due to intermittent shedding. Modern molecular methods including polymerase chain reaction can provide rapid, sensitive detection but are not yet widely used in routine surveillance.

Differential diagnosis for pullorum disease includes other causes of mortality and diarrhea in young chicks. Omphalitis, or navel infection, causes early mortality but typically without the characteristic white diarrhea. Colibacillosis produces similar clinical signs and may occur concurrently with pullorum disease. Aspergillosis causes respiratory signs and mortality in young chicks but has distinctive fungal lesions at necropsy. Nutritional deficiencies can cause weakness and mortality but lack infectious disease patterns. Other Salmonella serovars, particularly Salmonella Enteritidis, can cause similar clinical signs and require culture for differentiation. In older birds, positive serological tests must be distinguished from vaccination responses if killed Salmonella vaccines have been used.

Treatment Options

Treatment of pullorum disease with antimicrobials is strongly discouraged and considered contrary to sound disease control principles, despite the technical susceptibility of Salmonella Pullorum to many antibiotics. Antimicrobial treatment may reduce clinical signs and mortality in affected chicks, but it does not eliminate infection and creates carrier birds that continue to shed the organism and transmit it through their eggs. Treated flocks remain infected and pose ongoing risk to other poultry populations. Furthermore, antimicrobial use promotes resistance development that may affect control of other Salmonella infections with public health significance. For these reasons, regulatory programs and poultry health professionals universally recommend against treatment.

The standard response to confirmed pullorum disease is depopulation of affected flocks combined with thorough cleaning and disinfection of premises before repopulation. This approach eliminates the disease reservoir and prevents ongoing transmission. Depopulation decisions consider the extent of infection, value of affected birds, and regulatory requirements in the specific jurisdiction. In the United States, state poultry officials work with flock owners to implement appropriate response measures. Compensation programs may be available in some situations to offset economic losses associated with depopulation. Eggs from infected flocks should not be hatched, and infected adult birds should not be used for breeding purposes.

Surgical intervention has no role in pullorum disease control, as the systemic and reproductive tract localization of infection cannot be addressed surgically. The only physical intervention that might be considered is identification and removal of individual reactor birds when complete depopulation is not immediately feasible, though this approach is less effective than flock-wide measures and may miss infected birds that have not yet developed detectable antibody responses.

Supportive care for affected chicks, while not curative, may reduce mortality and suffering in flocks where immediate depopulation is not possible. Maintaining optimal brooding temperatures reduces cold stress that worsens outcomes. Providing electrolyte-supplemented water helps address dehydration from diarrhea. Easy access to palatable feed encourages intake in depressed chicks. Maintaining excellent sanitation reduces environmental bacterial loads and secondary infection pressure. However, supportive care should be viewed as humane management during the period before depopulation rather than as a treatment strategy, and it does not change the ultimate outcome or disease status of surviving birds.

Herd-level management during confirmed pullorum outbreaks focuses on containment and eradication rather than treatment. Quarantine prevents movement of potentially infected birds, eggs, or contaminated materials to other premises. Enhanced biosecurity prevents spread by personnel, equipment, or visitors. All birds in affected houses should be tested, and reactors removed. Eggs from affected flocks are destroyed or diverted to breaking plants with pasteurization. Complete cleanup of facilities including removal of organic material and application of effective disinfectants precedes repopulation. Only birds from pullorum-free, tested sources should be used for repopulation. Follow-up testing confirms successful elimination before resuming normal operations.

Economic and regulatory considerations dominate pullorum disease decision-making given the focus on eradication rather than treatment. Infected flocks have no commercial value for breeding purposes due to regulatory restrictions. Market birds from infected flocks may be processed for human consumption in some jurisdictions but face movement restrictions. The cost of depopulation and cleanup must be weighed against the consequences of allowing infected birds to continue production and potentially spread disease. Maintaining pullorum-free status has significant economic value, as it enables unrestricted commerce in hatching eggs and breeding stock. Long-term industry and public health benefits of eradication justify the economic costs imposed on individual affected operations.

Recovery & Prognosis

Recovery at the individual bird level is possible, as some chicks survive acute pullorum infection and appear to recover clinically. However, many surviving birds become chronic carriers that harbor the organism in their tissues, particularly the reproductive tract in females. These carriers appear healthy but intermittently shed Salmonella Pullorum and transmit it through their eggs, perpetuating the infection cycle. The carrier state is permanent; once infected, birds should be considered infected for life regardless of serological status, as antibody levels may fluctuate while the bird remains infected. This carrier state is why treatment is discouraged and eradication is the only acceptable control strategy.

Flock recovery from pullorum disease means successful eradication of the organism rather than clinical recovery of individual birds. Following depopulation of infected birds and thorough premises cleanup, repopulation with birds from pullorum-free sources begins the recovery process. Multiple rounds of testing following repopulation confirm successful eradication before flocks regain certified status. This process typically requires at least several months and multiple negative tests at appropriate intervals. Documentation of testing results, cleanup procedures, and source flock status supports restoration of certifications and return to normal commercial activities.

Prognosis for flocks affected by pullorum disease depends on the extent of infection and the approach taken. Flocks where infection is detected early and limited to a small number of birds have better prognosis for successful eradication without complete depopulation. Widespread infection in breeding flocks requires complete depopulation and extended recovery periods before resuming hatching egg production. Commercial meat bird flocks with limited lifespan may be grown to market weight under quarantine and then depopulated, with houses cleaned before the next placement. The long-term prognosis for operations that properly implement eradication measures is excellent, with successful return to pullorum-free status typically achieved.

Return to production considerations focus on restoration of certified status and commercial functionality rather than individual bird recovery. Breeding operations must demonstrate pullorum-free status through multiple rounds of testing before resuming hatching egg sales. Hatcheries associated with infected flocks must demonstrate effective cleanup and absence of environmental contamination. Markets for live bird sales may require documentation of testing history and certified status. International trade in poultry and hatching eggs has strict pullorum testing requirements that must be met for export certification. Full commercial recovery requires not just disease elimination but also restoration of market access and customer confidence.

Prevention

Testing and certification programs represent the foundation of pullorum prevention, having successfully eliminated the disease from commercial poultry in participating countries. The National Poultry Improvement Plan in the United States establishes standards for testing breeding flocks and classifying them by disease status. Participating flocks undergo regular testing, and those that test negative are certified as pullorum-clean, enabling unrestricted commerce in hatching eggs and breeding stock. Similar programs operate in other countries, with international trade requiring certification of pullorum-free status. Maintenance of these programs requires continued commitment to testing, as lapses in surveillance could allow reintroduction and establishment of infection.

Biosecurity measures complement testing programs by preventing introduction of Salmonella Pullorum to clean flocks. Sourcing birds only from pullorum-tested flocks eliminates the primary risk of introducing infected carriers. Controlling access to poultry premises by visitors, vehicles, and equipment reduces opportunities for mechanical transmission. Avoiding contact with untested backyard flocks and exhibition poultry protects commercial operations from potential exposure. Rodent and wild bird control limits potential wildlife involvement in transmission. Personnel should change clothing and footwear when moving between facilities and should not keep personal poultry if working with commercial flocks.

Hatchery sanitation plays a critical role in preventing transmission when infection is present and in maintaining cleanliness even in negative flocks. Egg selection excludes visibly dirty or cracked eggs that may harbor surface contamination. Egg sanitation through proper washing, sanitizing, and fumigation reduces surface bacterial loads. Setter and hatcher sanitation between batches removes residual organic material and accumulated microorganisms. Air handling systems are maintained to prevent cross-contamination between machines. Rigorous hatchery sanitation prevents amplification of any pathogens introduced and maintains the clean status of chicks produced.

Management practices supporting pullorum-free status integrate testing requirements with routine flock management. Record keeping documents bird sources, test dates and results, and any disease events. Personnel training ensures understanding of biosecurity requirements and disease recognition. Prompt investigation of unusual mortality or clinical signs enables rapid response if problems occur. Segregation of different ages, sources, or species prevents potential transmission between groups. Building and equipment maintenance eliminates reservoirs where contamination could persist.

Monitoring and response protocols ensure early detection and rapid action if pullorum disease is suspected or confirmed. Any unusual mortality patterns or clinical signs consistent with pullorum disease trigger immediate notification of poultry health officials. Submission of samples from sick or dead birds provides diagnostic confirmation. Positive test results initiate regulatory response including quarantine, additional testing, and development of elimination plans. Documentation of response measures supports eventual restoration of certified status. Regular communication with state poultry officials maintains awareness of regional disease status and any new threats that may emerge.

Living With & Managing Pullorum Disease (poultry)

Daily management in pullorum prevention programs focuses on maintaining biosecurity and monitoring for any signs of disease. Personnel entering poultry houses should follow established biosecurity protocols including changing footwear, handwashing, and avoiding contact with outside poultry. Daily observation of bird health enables early detection of problems that might indicate disease introduction. Mortality patterns are monitored, with any unusual increases triggering further investigation. Egg production and quality records may reveal subtle changes associated with reproductive tract infections in adult birds. Feed and water consumption monitoring identifies early signs of illness before clinical disease becomes apparent.

Facility management supports pullorum-free status through design and maintenance that enables effective biosecurity. Controlled entry points with defined clean and dirty areas facilitate proper transition procedures. Surfaces should be readily cleanable with no areas where organic material can accumulate and harbor pathogens. Ventilation systems should be designed to minimize disease transmission risk. Equipment is dedicated to specific facilities or thoroughly cleaned and disinfected between uses. Proper carcass disposal prevents scavenging and potential disease transmission through wildlife.

Participation in organized health programs provides structure and verification for pullorum control efforts. National Poultry Improvement Plan participation demonstrates commitment to disease control and enables certification for commercial purposes. State poultry associations often provide resources and support for participating flocks. Regular interaction with poultry health professionals keeps flock owners informed of best practices and emerging threats. Documentation generated through program participation creates records valuable for troubleshooting problems and demonstrating compliance.

Record keeping requirements for pullorum programs include maintenance of detailed flock records that trace bird sources, testing history, and health status. Individual bird or flock identification enables tracking throughout the production chain. Testing records document dates, methods, and results of all pullorum testing performed. Treatment records, if any treatments are administered for any purpose, document products used and withdrawal periods observed. Production records tracking mortality, egg production, and other parameters enable detection of subtle changes that might indicate problems. Sales records document recipients of birds and eggs for traceability if problems are later identified.

Economic aspects of pullorum-free management include both direct costs of testing and certification and economic benefits of disease-free status. Testing costs vary with flock size, testing frequency, and methods used but represent a relatively small investment compared to potential disease losses. Certification enables access to markets that require verified disease-free status, including export markets with significant price premiums. Freedom from pullorum disease eliminates mortality losses, treatment costs, and production impacts that affected flocks experience. The long-term economic benefits of maintaining pullorum-free status through continued investment in testing and biosecurity substantially exceed the costs for virtually all commercial poultry operations.

Breeds at Risk for Pullorum Disease (poultry)

Historical records suggest some breed differences in pullorum disease susceptibility, though these observations predate modern control programs and may not be reliable under current conditions. Heavier, slower-growing breeds may have shown greater resistance than lighter breeds developed for egg production, possibly reflecting differences in immune maturation rates or metabolic demands. Mediterranean breeds including Leghorns were sometimes considered more susceptible than American or Asiatic breeds. However, these observations were made when pullorum disease was common, and contemporary breeding programs have not had opportunity or need to select for resistance given the success of testing and eradication programs.

Commercial poultry types face different risk profiles based primarily on management and testing status rather than inherent susceptibility differences. Breeding flocks representing the top of the genetic pyramid receive the most intensive testing and are virtually always pullorum-free. Commercial layers and broilers derived from tested breeding stock share this protected status when sourced from participating hatcheries. Backyard and hobby flocks face elevated risk because they often lack systematic testing, may be sourced from untested populations, and may have contact with other untested birds at shows or through sales. Game fowl and exhibition breeds are sometimes implicated in pullorum outbreaks due to management practices that increase exposure risk.

Species susceptibility varies among gallinaceous birds potentially exposed to Salmonella Pullorum. Chickens are the primary natural host and show highest susceptibility, with young chicks experiencing the most severe disease. Turkeys are also susceptible and can experience significant mortality, though they may be somewhat more resistant than chickens. Other gallinaceous birds including pheasants, guinea fowl, quail, and peafowl can become infected and may serve as sources for chicken exposure. Waterfowl and other non-gallinaceous birds are generally resistant to infection and do not appear to play a significant role in pullorum epidemiology. Wild bird species occasionally test positive but are not considered important reservoirs for commercial poultry infection.

Related Conditions

Fowl typhoid, caused by the closely related Salmonella Gallinarum, shares many features with pullorum disease and is often discussed and controlled together. Both organisms are host-adapted, non-motile Salmonella that cause systemic disease in poultry and localize in the reproductive tract of carriers. The serology used for pullorum testing also detects fowl typhoid, which is why the test is often referred to as the pullorum-typhoid test. Fowl typhoid tends to cause more severe disease in adult birds compared to pullorum disease, but control measures are essentially identical. Both diseases are targeted by National Poultry Improvement Plan testing programs and have been effectively eliminated from participating flocks.

Other Salmonella infections in poultry may cause similar clinical signs, particularly in young birds, and must be differentiated from pullorum disease. Paratyphoid infections caused by various Salmonella serovars including Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis produce mortality and diarrhea in chicks that may resemble pullorum disease. These organisms are not host-adapted and have significant public health implications, making accurate diagnosis important. Salmonella Enteritidis has particular importance due to its association with egg-borne human foodborne illness. Culture and serotyping differentiate these infections from pullorum disease, though clinical differentiation may not be possible.

Complications of pullorum disease relate primarily to chronic infection in surviving birds and secondary effects of acute disease. Pericarditis, or inflammation of the heart sac, occurs in some infected birds and may cause chronic cardiac dysfunction. Peritonitis from reproductive tract infection leads to chronic illness and poor production in adult carriers. Joint infections produce lameness and reduced mobility. Reduced hatchability of eggs from infected hens affects reproductive efficiency even when chicks that do hatch survive. The carrier state itself, with its implications for ongoing transmission and regulatory restrictions, represents the most significant long-term complication of pullorum disease from a flock management perspective.