Ear Mites in Farm Animals

Quick Facts

🏥 Condition Name
Ear Mites
📋 Also Known As
Ear Mites
📂 Category
Ears
📁 Subcategory
N/A
🐄 Affects
External ear canal
🏷️ Type
Parasitic
⚠️ Severity
Mild to Moderate
💊 Treatable
Yes, with appropriate antiparasitic medications
🔄 Contagious
Highly contagious through direct contact
🧬 Hereditary
No
🐄 Common In
Cattle, goats, sheep, rabbits, and pigs

Ear Mites Overview

Ear mites are microscopic parasitic arthropods that infest the external ear canals of farm animals, causing irritation, inflammation, and secondary complications when populations proliferate unchecked. Several species of mites target the ears of livestock, with Raillietia auris commonly affecting cattle, Psoroptes cuniculi affecting goats and rabbits, and various other species infesting sheep, pigs, and other farm animals. These obligate parasites live within the protected environment of the ear canal, feeding on skin debris, cerumen, and tissue fluids while completing their entire life cycles on the host animal without requiring environmental stages.

Ear mite infestations occur across virtually all farm animal species, with prevalence varying by geographic region, management system, and season. Cattle ear mites caused by Raillietia auris are endemic in many tropical and subtropical regions, while Psoroptes cuniculi ear mites in goats and rabbits occur worldwide. The prevalence of ear mites tends to increase during cooler, wetter seasons when animals are housed in closer contact and when mite survival conditions are optimal. In extensively managed herds and flocks, ear mites may persist at low endemic levels with periodic flare-ups when conditions favor population expansion or when animal immunity is compromised.

The economic and welfare impact of ear mites in farm animals encompasses direct effects on individual animal health and indirect effects on herd productivity. Affected animals experience discomfort ranging from mild irritation to intense pruritus depending on mite populations and individual sensitivity. The behavioral responses to ear irritation, including head shaking, ear scratching, and rubbing against objects, disrupt normal feeding and resting patterns, leading to reduced weight gain, decreased milk production, and impaired reproductive performance. Secondary complications including aural hematoma, bacterial otitis, and self-inflicted trauma add to the welfare burden and treatment costs associated with ear mite infestations.

Early detection and prompt treatment of ear mites significantly improve outcomes for individual animals and help prevent widespread herd or flock infestation. When identified early at low mite densities, treatment with appropriate parasiticides typically achieves rapid and complete resolution without lasting effects. However, delayed treatment allows mite populations to explode, tissue damage to accumulate, and transmission to pen mates to occur. Regular ear examination should be incorporated into routine health monitoring programs, with particular attention during high-risk periods and in groups with history of ear mite problems.

Causes of Ear Mites

The primary cause of ear mite infestation in farm animals is colonization by species-specific parasitic mites that have evolved to exploit the ear canal habitat. In cattle, Raillietia auris is the most common ear mite, a soft-bodied mite that lives in the external ear canal and feeds on cerumen and skin debris. Goats and rabbits are commonly infested by Psoroptes cuniculi, which causes ear canker characterized by crusty lesions within the ear canal. Other mite species may affect various livestock species, with some overlap in host range among closely related mite genera. These mites are obligate parasites, depending entirely on their hosts for survival and unable to persist for extended periods in the environment.

Genetic and breed predisposition to ear mites relates primarily to ear conformation rather than inherent immunological differences, though both factors may play roles. Animals with larger, deeper ear canals may provide more extensive habitat supporting larger mite populations. Pendulous ears that restrict airflow may create warm, humid conditions favorable to mite proliferation. Some breeds may produce more cerumen, providing increased food resources for mites. Individual variation in immune responsiveness to mite antigens likely influences clinical severity for a given mite burden, with some animals tolerating substantial mite populations with minimal signs while others develop severe inflammation from relatively light infestations.

Environmental and management factors significantly influence ear mite introduction, transmission, and proliferation within livestock populations. The mites spread primarily through direct contact between infested and susceptible animals, making housing systems that bring animals into close proximity major risk factors. Shared equipment, particularly restraint devices, ear tag applicators, and examination instruments, can mechanically transfer mites between animals. Cool, moist conditions favor mite survival both on the host and during the brief periods when mites may be off the animal. Inadequate ventilation in housing facilities creates humid conditions within ear canals that support mite reproduction.

Risk factors for ear mite infestation include introduction of new animals from external sources without adequate quarantine and treatment, contact with infested neighbors across fence lines, overcrowded housing conditions, inadequate parasite control programs, and presence of other ectoparasite species that create tissue damage facilitating mite establishment. Young animals are often more susceptible to heavy infestations due to immature immune responses and their tendency for close physical contact with dam and herd mates. Stress from transport, dietary changes, concurrent illness, or adverse weather may increase susceptibility and allow existing low-level infestations to proliferate.

The pathophysiology of ear mite infestation involves mite feeding activities, host immune responses, and the resultant tissue changes within the ear canal. Mites feed on cerumen, epithelial debris, and tissue fluids, causing mechanical irritation through their movements and feeding. Their fecal material and body secretions provoke inflammatory and immune responses in the host, leading to increased cerumen production, epithelial proliferation, and accumulation of exudate. As mite populations grow, the inflammation intensifies, pruritus increases, and characteristic crusty or waxy accumulations develop within the ear canal. The intense scratching and head shaking triggered by ear mite irritation can lead to secondary complications including aural hematoma and traumatic injury to surrounding tissues.

Symptoms & Warning Signs

Early warning signs of ear mite infestation often manifest as subtle behavioral changes indicating ear discomfort before overt clinical signs develop. Affected animals may shake their heads slightly more often than normal, flick their ears repeatedly, or rub their ears against fences, posts, or other fixed objects. Some animals hold their ears in unusual positions or seem reluctant to allow handling of the head and ears. Decreased attentiveness, mild restlessness during rest periods, and irritability may reflect the chronic low-grade discomfort of early infestation. Observant caretakers who notice these early behavioral changes can prompt examination and treatment before infestations become severe.

Common symptoms of ear mites vary somewhat by species and by the specific mite involved but share fundamental features of ear irritation and discharge. In cattle with Raillietia auris, ear shaking, head rubbing, and accumulation of dark waxy material within the ear canal are typical findings. Goats with Psoroptes cuniculi develop characteristic ear canker with thick, crusty, grayish-brown material filling the ear canal that may have a distinctive odor. Rabbits show similar lesions with crusts that can become quite extensive if untreated. Sheep and pigs with ear mites display ear scratching, head shaking, and variable amounts of debris accumulation depending on the mite species and infestation intensity.

Behavioral changes associated with ear mite infestation reflect the irritation and discomfort these parasites cause. The persistent itching disrupts normal resting behavior, with affected animals spending increased time scratching, rubbing, and shaking their heads rather than lying down to rest or ruminate. Feed intake may decrease as eating time is displaced by scratching behavior and as chronic discomfort suppresses appetite. Animals may become head-shy, avoiding handling and showing defensive reactions when people approach their heads. Social interactions can be affected, with some infested animals becoming more irritable while others withdraw from normal group activities.

Physical signs of ear mites include visible debris accumulation within the ear canal, redness and inflammation of ear canal tissues, and sometimes extension of lesions to the inner surface of the pinna. The character of the debris varies by mite species: Raillietia auris in cattle produces dark, waxy accumulations, while Psoroptes cuniculi causes thick, crusty, grayish-tan material. In severe cases, the ear canal may become completely occluded with accumulated debris. Mites themselves may be visible on close examination, particularly Psoroptes species which are relatively large. Secondary changes including thickening of ear canal tissues, excoriation from scratching, and signs of bacterial infection may be present in chronic cases.

Symptom progression in untreated ear mite infestations follows a pattern of gradual intensification as mite populations increase and tissue damage accumulates. Initial infestation may produce minimal signs as mite numbers are low and host tolerance is maintained. As the mite population grows over weeks to months, clinical signs become progressively more obvious and severe. The characteristic ear debris accumulates, inflammation increases, and pruritus intensifies. Without treatment, affected animals may develop secondary complications including aural hematoma from trauma, bacterial otitis from compromised ear canal defenses, and self-inflicted wounds from intense scratching. Chronic untreated infestations can result in permanent ear canal changes.

Emergency symptoms requiring immediate veterinary intervention for ear mites relate primarily to secondary complications rather than the mite infestation itself. Sudden development of aural hematoma, recognized as rapid swelling of the ear pinna, requires prompt attention to prevent permanent ear deformity. Evidence of severe secondary bacterial infection with purulent discharge, fever, or signs of middle ear involvement warrants aggressive treatment. Animals showing extreme distress, self-mutilation from scratching, or inability to maintain normal feed and water intake need immediate evaluation. While ear mite infestation alone is rarely a veterinary emergency, the complications it can trigger may require urgent care.

Diagnosis

Clinical examination for ear mites begins with behavioral observation from a distance, noting any head shaking, ear scratching, or abnormal ear carriage before the animal is restrained. Careful visual inspection of both ears compares the potentially affected side with the normal ear and assesses the external ear canal for debris, inflammation, and discharge. Otoscopic examination provides better visualization of the ear canal, revealing the characteristic material associated with different mite species and potentially allowing direct observation of mites within the canal. The character and odor of ear debris provide diagnostic clues, with waxy dark material suggesting Raillietia in cattle while crusty grayish material indicates Psoroptes in goats. Palpation of the ear base and surrounding areas assesses for complications such as hematoma or regional lymph node enlargement.

Diagnostic tests for ear mites center on demonstration of the causative organisms through microscopic examination of ear debris. Samples are collected using cotton-tipped applicators, curettes, or gentle scraping of material from the ear canal. The collected debris is placed on a glass slide with mineral oil and examined under low magnification. Mites are identified based on their morphological characteristics including body shape, leg structure, and mouthpart configuration. Different mite species have distinctive features allowing specific diagnosis. Multiple samples may be needed if initial examination is negative but clinical suspicion remains high. In cattle, Raillietia auris can sometimes be identified without magnification as small moving dots within the waxy ear debris when material is spread thinly.

Differential diagnosis for ear irritation and debris accumulation in farm animals includes other parasitic conditions, infections, and non-infectious causes requiring different treatment approaches. Psoroptic mange affecting the ears produces similar crusty lesions but may be part of generalized body involvement. Bacterial and yeast infections of the ear canal cause inflammation and discharge that may mimic mite infestation. Foreign bodies within the ear canal create localized irritation without generalized debris accumulation. Allergic conditions affecting the ears cause inflammation without characteristic mite debris. Tumors of the ear canal are uncommon but should be considered in cases with unusual presentations. Definitive diagnosis requires demonstration of mites through microscopic examination.

Herd-level diagnostic considerations become important when ear mites are confirmed in any animal within a group, as the highly contagious nature of these parasites means that in-contact animals are likely also infested. Systematic examination of all animals in the affected group determines the extent of infestation and identifies animals that may be subclinical carriers capable of perpetuating transmission. Assessment of recent animal introductions, contact opportunities with external animals, and biosecurity breaches helps identify the source of introduction. Review of historical health records may reveal whether ear mites have been an ongoing endemic problem or represent a new introduction to the herd or flock.

Treatment Options

Emergency and immediate treatment of ear mites focuses on addressing any acute complications while initiating antiparasitic therapy. Animals with severe irritation benefit from anti-inflammatory medications that reduce inflammation and pruritus, helping restore normal behavior and feed intake while the parasiticide takes effect. Any secondary bacterial infection requires appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Aural hematomas that have developed as a consequence of head shaking and scratching should be addressed through appropriate drainage and management to prevent permanent ear deformity. Moving severely affected animals to individual housing can prevent ongoing transmission to pen mates and reduce stress during the initial treatment period.

Medical management of ear mites in farm animals relies on parasiticides that effectively kill mites at all life stages present in the ear canal. Injectable macrocyclic lactones including ivermectin, doramectin, moxidectin, and eprinomectin provide systemic treatment reaching mites within the ear canal through distribution in tissue fluids. These products typically require two treatments at seven to fourteen day intervals to kill mites that were in the egg stage during initial treatment and have since hatched. Pour-on formulations of macrocyclic lactones offer easier application and may provide adequate tissue levels for ear mite control. For all treatments in food-producing animals, strict attention to withdrawal times is mandatory, with careful documentation of products, doses, and treatment dates.

Topical treatment of ear mites may supplement or replace systemic therapy depending on the severity of infestation and the species involved. Gentle cleaning of the ear canal to remove accumulated debris improves the penetration and effectiveness of topical medications. Direct instillation of parasiticides into the ear canal, including ivermectin solutions, provides high local concentrations at the site of infestation. Mineral oil or other occlusive agents can help smother mites and soften crusts for easier removal. In goats and rabbits with Psoroptes cuniculi, combination of systemic and topical treatment often provides optimal results. Any topical products used in food-producing animals must have established safety and withdrawal data or be prescribed under veterinary guidance.

Supportive care during ear mite treatment includes environmental management, comfort measures, and nutritional support. Housing should be clean and dry with fresh bedding to minimize environmental mite contamination. Good nutrition supports immune function and recovery from the stress of infestation. Continued anti-inflammatory therapy throughout the treatment period improves comfort and encourages normal behavior. Animals that have lost condition due to chronic infestation may benefit from supplemental feeding. Protection from environmental stressors during recovery promotes optimal treatment outcomes.

Herd treatment protocols for ear mites must address the highly contagious nature of these parasites to achieve lasting control. When mites are confirmed in any animal, treatment of all in-contact animals is recommended regardless of whether they show clinical signs, as subclinical carriers perpetuate transmission cycles. Simultaneous treatment of the entire group, with repeat treatments at appropriate intervals, maximizes the probability of complete elimination. Environmental cleanup including thorough cleaning of housing facilities, replacement of bedding, and disinfection of handling equipment removes mites that may have transferred to fomites. Enhanced biosecurity measures prevent reintroduction from external sources.

Treatment decisions for ear mites consider animal welfare, economic factors, and regulatory requirements together. Direct treatment costs include parasiticides, labor for animal handling, and any supportive care needed. Indirect costs encompass production losses during treatment and the withdrawal period before animals can be marketed. For most ear mite infestations, treatment costs are modest and justified by welfare improvements and prevention of costly complications. Withdrawal times for all products must be observed and documented for food-producing animals. Working with the herd or flock veterinarian ensures selection of appropriate products and protocols for the specific situation and regulatory environment.

Recovery & Prognosis

Recovery timeline for ear mite infestation depends on the severity at the time of treatment, the effectiveness of the treatment protocol, and the presence of any secondary complications. Following effective parasiticide treatment, mite populations begin dying within days, and clinical improvement typically becomes apparent within one to two weeks. The intense pruritus subsides relatively quickly as mite numbers decrease, with affected animals showing behavioral improvement as scratching diminishes and normal activity patterns resume. Complete resolution of accumulated ear debris may take several weeks as the ear canal gradually clears and normal cerumen production replaces pathological accumulations.

Post-treatment care and monitoring for animals recovering from ear mites includes observation for treatment success, detection of any recurrence, and management of complications. Follow-up examination at two to three weeks after completing treatment verifies elimination of mites through repeated ear examination and microscopic evaluation of any debris. Animals should be monitored for continued improvement in ear appearance and resolution of any secondary infections. Those that developed aural hematomas need continued management of these lesions. Behavioral observation confirms return to normal patterns including appropriate feeding behavior, resting patterns, and social interactions with herd or flock mates.

Prognosis for ear mite infestation is excellent when appropriate treatment is administered and completed properly. Most animals recover completely without lasting effects when infestations are identified and treated before severe complications develop. Even moderately severe infestations typically resolve well with proper treatment, though ear canal tissues may take several weeks to return to normal appearance. Animals that developed secondary bacterial otitis may require extended antimicrobial therapy but generally recover without permanent hearing effects if middle ear involvement is avoided. Those with aural hematomas may have residual ear deformity depending on severity and management.

Return to production considerations for livestock recovering from ear mites include verification of treatment success, observance of medication withdrawal periods, and prevention of reinfection. Animals should not be moved or commingled with the main herd until treatment is complete and follow-up examination confirms mite elimination. Withdrawal times for all parasiticides used must be carefully observed before slaughter, with accurate record keeping supporting regulatory compliance. Prevention of reinfection requires maintaining biosecurity measures and treating any new animal introductions. For breeding animals, reproductive activities can resume once treatment is complete and the animal has recovered normal comfort and behavior.

Prevention

Vaccination is not available for prevention of ear mites in farm animals, as these ectoparasites have not been successfully targeted by immunological approaches. No commercial vaccines exist for ear mites in any livestock species, and prevention relies entirely on management strategies including biosecurity, strategic treatment, and environmental control. Research continues into understanding mite immunology and host immune responses, but practical vaccine development remains distant. Maintaining overall animal health through appropriate nutrition, housing, and vaccination against other diseases supports general immune function but does not confer specific protection against ear mite infestation.

Biosecurity measures form the most important component of ear mite prevention programs in farm animal operations. Maintaining closed herds or flocks eliminates the most common route of mite introduction. When new animals must be acquired, purchasing from sources with documented freedom from ear mites reduces risk. Strict quarantine of all incoming animals with examination and prophylactic treatment prevents introduction to the main group. Double fencing to prevent nose-to-nose contact with neighboring animals eliminates transmission across boundary lines. Dedicated equipment for each farm and thorough cleaning of any shared equipment prevents mechanical transfer of mites between operations.

Strategic parasite treatment programs provide additional protection against ear mite establishment even when occasional introduction occurs. Regular treatment of all animals with macrocyclic lactone parasiticides for internal parasite control also provides activity against ear mites, potentially eliminating any introduced mites before populations establish. Timing treatments to correspond with high-risk periods such as housing in autumn or after introduction of new animals maximizes effectiveness. In operations with endemic ear mites, systematic treatment programs aimed at reducing mite populations to levels where clinical disease does not occur may be more practical than attempting eradication.

Management practices supporting ear mite prevention include maintaining appropriate stocking density to reduce close contact and transmission opportunities, ensuring adequate ventilation in housing facilities to minimize humidity within ear canals, and regular ear examination of all animals to identify problems early. Staff training ensures all personnel recognize signs of ear mite infestation and understand the importance of prompt reporting. Record keeping tracks animal health events, treatments administered, and any disease occurrences to support ongoing monitoring and investigation of any problems. Avoiding mixing animals from different sources when possible reduces introduction risk.

Quarantine and testing protocols for new animal introductions provide critical control points for preventing ear mite entry into uninfested populations. All incoming animals should be held in isolation facilities with no direct or indirect contact with existing stock for a minimum of three weeks. During quarantine, thorough examination of both ears including otoscopic inspection and microscopic examination of ear debris should be performed. Prophylactic treatment with effective parasiticides should be administered regardless of examination findings. Treatment should be repeated at seven to fourteen day intervals to ensure elimination of any mites in egg stages at initial treatment. Only animals confirmed free of ear mites following completed quarantine should be introduced to the main herd or flock.

Living With & Managing Ear Mites

Daily management and monitoring for ear mite control requires integration of ear health observation into routine animal care activities. Personnel feeding, handling, or moving animals should observe for behavioral signs of ear irritation including head shaking, scratching, and ear rubbing. Any animals displaying these behaviors warrant closer examination of their ears for mite infestation. Systematic inspection of animal ears during routine handling events such as vaccination, weighing, or reproductive management provides regular surveillance without requiring additional handling. Training all farm personnel to recognize signs of ear mites and report concerns promptly supports early detection before infestations become severe or spread widely through the group.

Housing and environmental management influence ear mite risk through effects on animal contact patterns, humidity levels, and mite survival. Indoor housing increases opportunities for mite transmission through close contact between animals. Adequate ventilation reduces humidity within housing facilities and in ear canals, creating less favorable conditions for mite proliferation. Appropriate stocking density minimizes the intensity of contact and may slow transmission rates. Clean, dry bedding reduces environmental contamination with mites that may have detached from hosts. Regular removal and replacement of bedding, particularly from areas where animals rest their heads, eliminates potential mite reservoirs.

Herd health programs incorporating parasite surveillance and control provide the framework for managing ear mites within the broader context of animal health. Regular veterinary involvement supports appropriate diagnostic testing when problems are suspected and ensures access to effective prescription medications. Scheduled treatments with macrocyclic lactones for internal parasite control provide concurrent activity against ear mites, potentially maintaining populations at levels below clinical significance. Integration of ear examination into routine health monitoring ensures consistent surveillance. For operations with history of ear mite problems, enhanced monitoring protocols and strategic treatment programs may be warranted.

Record keeping and monitoring systems support ear mite management by documenting health status, treatments administered, and disease occurrences over time. Individual animal identification enables tracking of animals with current or historical ear mite problems. Records of animal movements onto and off the property support tracing in the event of new introductions. Treatment records including products used, dates, doses, and withdrawal periods ensure regulatory compliance for food-producing animals. Aggregate analysis of health records may reveal patterns in ear mite occurrence, guiding adjustments to prevention and control strategies.

Economic considerations in ear mite management include prevention costs, treatment expenses, and production impacts. Prevention investments encompass biosecurity infrastructure, quarantine facilities, prophylactic treatments, and labor for monitoring. These costs are generally modest compared to the expenses and production losses associated with severe ear mite outbreaks. Treatment costs include parasiticides, labor for handling animals, and any medications needed for secondary complications. Production losses during clinical infestation include reduced growth rates, decreased milk production, and impaired reproductive performance. Cost-benefit analysis typically supports investment in prevention programs that maintain ear mite-free status or control endemic populations at subclinical levels.

Breeds at Risk for Ear Mites

High-risk breeds and species for ear mites span all commonly kept farm animal species, though particular mite species have specific host preferences. Cattle of all breeds are susceptible to Raillietia auris ear mites, with no strong breed predispositions established. Goats are highly susceptible to Psoroptes cuniculi, with all breeds affected regardless of ear type or production purpose. Sheep may be affected by various mite species that can involve the ears. Rabbits, whether kept for meat, fiber, or as pets, are very commonly affected by Psoroptes cuniculi ear mites. Pigs can harbor ear mites, though this is generally less common or less commonly diagnosed than in other species. Within species, ear conformation may influence susceptibility, with larger ear canals potentially supporting larger mite populations.

Production type considerations influence ear mite risk primarily through differences in housing and management rather than inherent susceptibility differences. Intensively housed animals in close contact experience higher transmission rates than extensively managed animals with more space between individuals. Dairy goats housed indoors may face higher ear mite pressure than rangeland meat goats. Rabbit operations with close housing of multiple animals see rapid mite spread when infestations occur. Show animals attending events with animal commingling face elevated exposure risk from contact with animals from other operations. The production system also influences treatment options, with withdrawal requirements affecting product selection for animals destined for food production.

Genetic selection and testing for ear mite resistance is not currently practiced in any livestock species. All animals within susceptible species are presumed vulnerable to infestation if exposed to mites. No genetic markers have been identified that predict resistance or susceptibility to ear mites. Selection for general disease resistance and immune function might provide some indirect benefit, but specific selection against ear mite susceptibility is not feasible with current knowledge. Ear conformation might be considered in breeding decisions, with preference for ear types that provide less favorable mite habitat, though this is not a current selection priority in any species. Management-based prevention through biosecurity and strategic treatment remains the primary approach to ear mite control.

Related Conditions

Commonly co-occurring conditions with ear mites include the secondary complications that develop as a result of mite activity and the host's response to infestation. Aural hematoma frequently develops secondary to the vigorous head shaking and ear scratching triggered by mite irritation, requiring separate treatment to prevent permanent ear deformity. Bacterial otitis commonly complicates ear mite infestations as the damaged ear canal tissues become colonized by opportunistic bacteria. Skin lesions from self-trauma around the ears may become secondarily infected. In goats and rabbits with Psoroptes cuniculi, extension of mites and secondary infection from the ears to surrounding skin of the head and neck can occur. Other ectoparasite infestations may be present concurrently in animals with inadequate overall parasite control programs.

Conditions with similar symptoms requiring differentiation from ear mites include other causes of ear irritation and debris accumulation. Psoroptic mange involving the ears may be part of generalized body infestation rather than isolated ear disease. Bacterial and yeast ear infections cause inflammation and discharge without mites being present. Foreign bodies in the ear canal create localized irritation with different examination findings. Allergic conditions affecting the ears produce inflammation without characteristic mite debris. Ear tumors, though uncommon, can cause progressive ear changes that might initially be mistaken for parasitic disease. Definitive diagnosis requires demonstration of mites through microscopic examination of ear canal debris.

Complications and sequelae of ear mite infestation include conditions that develop as consequences of the primary parasitic problem. Aural hematoma from repeated head shaking can result in permanent ear deformity if not properly managed. Secondary bacterial otitis may progress to involve middle ear structures if the tympanic membrane is compromised, potentially causing permanent hearing loss or vestibular dysfunction. Chronic ear mite infestation can lead to permanent thickening and narrowing of the ear canal that predisposes to recurrent problems. Self-inflicted wounds from intense scratching may become severely infected. In severe cases, the stress and discomfort of chronic untreated infestation can have lasting effects on animal welfare, behavior, and productivity.